AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of CHARLES E. HOLSTER III, Appellant, v. JOHN MATTHEWS et al., Respondents, and MURIEL FINKEL, Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the petitioner's designating petition was invalid owing to a complete failure to number consecutively the 87 sheets of the petition in compliance with Election Law § 6-134 (2) (see, Matter of Braxton v Mahoney, 63 N.Y.2d 691). None of the sheets were numbered as required by statute (see, Matter of Braxton v. Mahoney, supra). Under the circumstances, there was not substantial compliance with the statute (cf., Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N.Y.2d 798, 799; Matter of Jonas v. Black, 104 A.D.2d 466, affd 63 N.Y.2d 685; Matter of Frawley v. Regan, 77 A.D.2d 937). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Sullivan, Lawrence and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HOLSTER v. MATTHEWS
(Aug 25, 1992)