AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of SIDNEY JONAS et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT S. BLACK et al., Constituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondents, and DAVID FISHER, Respondent-Respondent.

Judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application granted, and the Board of Elections is directed to place the names of Sidney Jonas and Paul Van Blake on the appropriate ballots.

Twenty-two signatures were required on petitioners' designating petition. They submitted 45 signatures on 18 consecutively numbered pages in one volume. The volume also included two unnumbered sheets containing a total of five signatures. The unnumbered sheets and the signatures appearing thereon were not counted in the computation of the total pages and signatures as stated on the cover sheet. Special Term held there were no valid signatures because the inclusion of the unnumbered pages containing signatures constituted a failure to comply with the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 6-134 Elec. of the Election Law requiring the consecutive numbering of pages and that the cover sheet state the number of pages and signatures.

We disagree. Under the circumstances, the inadvertent inclusion of superfluous pages and unclaimed signatures constituted inconsequential error. There was substantial compliance with subdivision 2 of section 6-134 Elec. of the Election Law ( Matter of Rosen. v McNab, 25 N.Y.2d 798; Matter of Reed v Power, 37 A.D.2d 793; Matter of Kantrowitz v Goldin, 47 Misc.2d 658, aff'd 24 A.D.2d 735, aff'd 16 N.Y.2d 841). Bracken, J.P., O'Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF JONAS v. BLACK
(Aug 22, 1984)