PER CURIAM
Motion for clarification granted. Opinion clarified by directing trial court to vacate judgment n.o.v. entered June 20, 1990, and to reinstate judgment in plaintiff's favor entered May 4, 1990.
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff requests clarification of our opinion. 118 Or. App. 298, 846 P.2d 1203 (1993). In that opinion, we reversed and remanded "for entry of judgment on the verdict" in plaintiff's favor. Plaintiff points out that a judgment on the verdict in her favor already was entered on May 4, 1990. That judgment was superseded by the judgment n.o.v., entered June 20, 1990, which we ordered must be set aside. Rather than enter a new judgment in plaintiff's favor, she argues, we should order the trial court to set aside its June 20, 1990, judgment and to reinstate the original May 4, 1990, judgment.
Plaintiff is correct. Pearson v. Schmitt, 260 Or. 607, 609, 492 P.2d 269 (1971); Brewer v. Erwin, 70 Or. App. 709, 714, 690 P.2d 1122 (1984), mod 75 Or. App. 132, 705 P.2d 242 (1985).
Motion for clarification granted. Opinion clarified by directing trial court to vacate judgment n.o.v. entered June 20, 1990, and to reinstate judgment in plaintiff's favor entered May 4, 1990.