Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BREWER, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, v. ERWIN et al, Respondents — Cross-Appellants. BREWER, Respondent,

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration granted; previous opinion adhered to as modified.

PER CURIAM

Defendants petition the Supreme Court for review of our recent opinion clarifying our original decision. Brewer v. Erwin, 70 Or. App. 709, 690 P.2d 1122 (1984). We treat the petition for review as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10(1). We grant the petition and modify our decision to provide that interest on the judgment for plaintiff shall run from October 21, 1980, the date of the original judgment, rather than from June 20, 1980, the date of the jury verdict. ORS 82.010(3). With this modification, we adhere to our previous opinion.

Defendants also attack our action in clarifying our original decision, asserting that the issue is not properly before us. Defendants should remember that they petitioned us to clarify the original opinion. It ill behooves them to complain about the outcome when they helped provoke our action.

Reconsideration granted; previous opinion adhered to as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BREWER v. ERWIN
(Oct 15, 1985)