Casey, J.
The order of protection from which respondent appeals has, by its own terms, expired and, therefore, respondent's appeal from the order, including the denial of his request for a second psychiatric evaluation of the parties and the children, is moot (see, Matter of Brown v Brown, 185 A.D.2d 812). As to respondent's appeal from the order which committed him to a community service work program, there is ample support in the record of Family Court's finding that respondent willfully violated the temporary order of protection.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, White and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal from order entered April 3, 1992 is dismissed, as moot, without costs. Ordered that the order entered March 23, 1992 is affirmed, without costs.