AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

WILLIAM ALLAN, JR., et al., Respondents, v. ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. GENERAL STEEL FABRICATORS, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted partial summary judgment to plaintiffs on the issue of defendants' liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). William Allan, Jr. (plaintiff), an ironworker, fell approximately 30 feet when a beam upon which he was sitting became detached at one end and fell, throwing him to the ground. Plaintiff asserted that no safety devices were provided by defendants. Third-party defendants contend that a factual issue exists whether plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker.

We conclude that the evidence provided by third-party defendants, that safety belts and lines were available on the work site and that workers were told to use them, fails to raise a factual issue whether plaintiff "refused to use the safety devices that were provided by the owner or employer" under the circumstance in which plaintiff fell (Stolt v. General Foods Corp., 81 N.Y.2d 918, 920; see also, Hagins v. State of New York, 81 N.Y.2d 921; Murray v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 199 A.D.2d 984; Laurie v. Niagara Candy, 188 A.D.2d 1075, 1075-1076).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALLAN v. ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
(Nov 16, 1994)