AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LEWIS P. LAURIE et al., Respondents, v. NIAGARA CANDY, INC., Respondent, and RIGGER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant. FRIENDSHIP CONSTRUCTION, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Labor Law § 240 (1) liability. Plaintiff Lewis P. Laurie (plaintiff), an employee of third-party defendant Friendship Construction, Inc., was injured when he fell from a ladder while engaged in the construction of a building owned by defendant Niagara Candy, Inc. Although plaintiff wore a safety belt with a tie-off line that he was not using, no proof was offered that he was told to use it under the circumstances in which he fell. Thus, there is no merit to the argument of Friendship and defendant and third-party plaintiff Rigger Construction Co., Inc., the general contractor, that plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker (see, Donovan v City of Buffalo, 185 A.D.2d 703).

The court properly granted Niagara Candy's cross motion for summary judgment against Rigger for common-law and contractual indemnification and Rigger's cross motion for summary judgment against Friendship for common-law indemnification because there was no proof that either Niagara Candy or Rigger directed, supervised or controlled the work in question (see, Schwalm v County of Monroe, 158 A.D.2d 994; Pietsch v Moog, Inc., 156 A.D.2d 1019; cf., De Crisci v PC Food Mkts., 107 A.D.2d 1029).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAURIE v. NIAGARA CANDY, INC
(Dec 30, 1992)