AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of YAHYA ASSAKAF, Appellant, v. JONATHAN ARDEN, Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding to compel the Medical Examiner of Kings County to disclose all medical and lab reports pertaining to the petitioner's underlying criminal action wherein he was convicted, inter alia, of murder in the second degree (two counts), which judgment was affirmed by this Court (see, People v As-Sakaf, 207 A.D.2d 899). These reports were exempt from disclosure by New York City Charter § 557 (g) (see, Public Officers Law § 87); Matter of Mullady v Bogard, 153 Misc.2d 1018). Moreover, we note that County Law § 677 is not applicable to the petitioner's request because the County Law does not apply to Kings County (see, County Law § 2 [a]). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ASSAKAF v. ARDEN
(Dec 12, 1994)