Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff failed to establish that she sustained a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The affirmations of the plaintiff's physician consisted of "conclusory assertions tailored to meet statutory requirements", and were thus insufficient to defeat summary judgment ( Lopez v Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017, 1019; DuMont v. Sandhir, 201 A.D.2d 450). The physician's affirmations failed to set forth any limitations on the plaintiff nor any objective medical tests to support his findings ( see, Baker v. Zelem, 202 A.D.2d 617). In addition, the mere use of the words "permanent" and "totally disabled" by the plaintiff's physician were insufficient to defeat summary judgment ( see, Stallone v. County of Suffolk, 209 A.D.2d 403). The plaintiff's continuing subjective complaints of pain, and her self-serving statements that she was unable to work and perform her usual activities set forth in her affidavit were also insufficient to defeat summary judgment ( see, Iglesias v. Inland Freightways, 209 A.D.2d 479; Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774). Sullivan, J.P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.