Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the court erred in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty without first appointing new counsel and holding a hearing is without merit. The decision whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court ( see, People v. McDowell, 198 A.D.2d 236). The minutes of the plea proceedings show that the defendant entered a knowing and voluntary Alford plea ( see, North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25), and completely refute the claims he made at sentencing. The defendant's unhappiness with the agreement will not justify withdrawal of the plea ( see, People v Leggett, 163 A.D.2d 862). In the absence of anything in the record to suggest that the defendant's plea was either improvident or baseless, his assertions of innocence and that he was ill-advised are insufficient to warrant withdrawal of the plea ( see, People v. Bourdonnay, 160 A.D.2d 1014).
The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal the judgment of conviction ( see, People v. Holman, 89 N.Y.2d 876; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1).
Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.