AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CURTIS McDOWELL, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that he should have been permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty. The decision to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, CPL 220.60; People v Dickerson, 163 A.D.2d 610). The defendant's unsupported, conclusory allegation of innocence at sentencing did not warrant the vacatur of his plea (see, People v Chestnut, 188 A.D.2d 480; People v Dickerson, supra; People v Bourdonnay, 160 A.D.2d 1014). Accordingly, it was not an improvident exercise of the court's discretion to deny the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without holding a hearing (see, People v Chestnut, supra; People v Dickerson, supra). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. McDOWELL
(Nov 1, 1993)