Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the weapons recovered from the taxicab in which he was a passenger should have been suppressed because the police stop of the taxicab was a pretext. However, the record shows that the officers properly stopped the taxicab upon observing it drive through a red light ( see, People v. Batista, 88 N.Y.2d 650; People v. Ellis, 62 N.Y.2d 393; People v. McCoy, 239 A.D.2d 437; People v. Ardila, 159 A.D.2d 710).
Moreover, once the police observed one handgun in plain view on the floor in the rear passenger area of the taxicab, the officers were entitled not only to seize that weapon, but also to search the defendant and his companion, both of whom were carrying additional handguns on their persons ( see, People v Robinson, 74 N.Y.2d 773, cert denied 493 U.S. 966; see also, Matter of Marcellius H. R., 229 A.D.2d 578).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.