Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the petitioner's request to appoint a Law Guardian for the child or in refusing to allow testimony from the petitioner's forensic experts ( see, Richard D. v. Wendy P., 47 N.Y.2d 943; Matter of Kosinski v. Mahoney, 207 A.D.2d 1014; Mascoli v. Mascoli, 132 A.D.2d 653). In addition, upon our review of the record, we agree with the Family Court that the petitioner did not demonstrate a material change of circumstances warranting a modification of visitation as requested by the petition ( see, Matter of Induddi v Moore, 214 A.D.2d 616; Matter of Brocher v. Brocher, 213 A.D.2d 544).
Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.