AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of ALFRED R. SATIN, deceased. HAROLD SATIN, etc., appellant; MARVIN L. TENZER, P.C., respondent.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law with costs payable by Marvin L. Tenzer personally, and the motion is granted.

It is well settled that "[a]n attorney who engages in misconduct by violating the Disciplinary Rules is not entitled to legal fees for any services rendered" ( Matter of Winston, 214 A.D.2d 677; Shelton v. Shelton, 151 A.D.2d 659; see also, Pessoni v. Rabkin, 220 A.D.2d 732; Brill v. Friends World Coll., 133 A.D.2d 729). The record reveals that Marvin L. Tenzer, knowing that the executor was represented by counsel who had advised against executing a finder's fee agreement, violated the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7-104(A) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.35[A]) by secretly meeting with and inducing the executor to execute the finder's fee agreement. As a result, the Surrogate's Court should have granted the executor's motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the second objection filed by Tenzer's professional corporation for a finder's fee.

RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SATIN
(Oct 4, 1999)