AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Estate of HARRY WINSTON, Deceased. RONALD WINSTON, Appellant, et al., Petitioners; ROGERS WELLS, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying the branch of the petitioner's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the respondent's claim for legal fees from March 26, 1990, to December 31, 1990, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the petitioner.

"[A]n attorney who engages in misconduct by violating the Disciplinary Rules is not entitled to legal fees for any services rendered" (Shelton v Shelton, 151 A.D.2d 659). Here, Rogers Wells' representation of Bankers Trust Company of New York, against former client Ronald Winston's wishes, violated the Code of Professional Responsibility (see, e.g., Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-108 [A] [1] [ 22 NYCRR 1200.27 (a) (1)]). Accordingly, the firm may not recover legal fees from March 26, 1990, until December 31, 1990 (see, Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 A.D.2d 729; Matter of Klenk, 151 Misc.2d 863, affd 204 A.D.2d 640; Matter of Merrick, 107 Misc.2d 988; Estate of Abel, NYLJ, Oct. 23, 1992, at 26, col 3). However, there are questions of fact as to whether the firm is entitled to compensation for legal services rendered from January 25, 1990, until March 25, 1990. Santucci, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF WINSTON
(Apr 17, 1995)