AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID PENA, Defendant-Appellant.

The court properly denied defendant's challenge made pursuant toBatson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). The record supports the court's conclusion that the reasons proffered by the prosecutor for exercising peremptory challenges against the two prospective jurors at issue were race-neutral and nonpretextual. A trial court's findings with respect to pretextuality are entitled to great deference (see, People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, affd 500 U.S. 352), particularly where, as here, the court has employed its unique opportunity to observe demeanor in making its findings (see, People v. Barnes, 261 A.D.2d 281, 691 N.Y.S.2d 49).

The court properly declined to submit criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree as a lesser included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant, there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater offense (see, People v. Butler, 248 A.D.2d 274, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 1005). The evidence, including the testimony of the chemists, clearly established that the weight of the cocaine seized from defendant was several times the statutory threshold of 500 milligrams.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

ELLERIN, P.J., NARDELLI, LERNER, ANDRIAS, FRIEDMAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PENA
(Oct 28, 1999)