The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer that the automobile lock was destroyed during the crime.
Defendant's Batson motion was properly denied. The record supports the court's finding that the People provided a race-neutral, nonpretextual reason for their challenge to the prospective juror in question. The court implicitly accepted the prosecutor's observation that the prospective juror, through his demeanor, showed particular distrust for the police when asked, along with other jurors, about police untruthfulness. The court's findings concerning discriminatory intent are entitled to great deference ( People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, affd 500 U.S. 352), particularly where they involve matters of demeanor, which the trial court has a unique opportunity to observe ( see, People v. Haywood, 251 A.D.2d 255, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 898).
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.