AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MANUEL OCHOA, appellant, v. JOSE E. PORTILLO, defendant, SONDRA D. LIEBERMAN, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated January 4, 1999, as denied his motion for summary judgment against the defendant Sondra D. Lieberman.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are triable issues of fact concerning the reasonableness of the conduct of the defendant Sondra D. Lieberman, which preclude the award of summary judgment in this case (see, Hurley v. Izzo, 248 A.D.2d 674 ; LaFond v. City of New York, 245 A.D.2d 268 ).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

FRIEDMANN, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OCHOA v. PORTILLO
(Nov 8, 1999)