DECISION JUDGMENT
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner's contention that the determination finding him guilty of possession of an altered item , i.e., altered postage stamps, is not supported by substantial evidence, is without merit (see, CPLR 7803[4]; Matter of Lahey v. Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135, 140 ; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181 ).
Although the misbehavior report was not signed or endorsed by the correction officer who found the altered stamps, it was signed by the correction officer who brought the stamps to Post Office personnel to confirm that they had been altered. The petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced as a result of any technical defects in the report (see, 7 NYCRR 251-3.1[a]; Matter of Adams v. Stinson, 267 A.D.2d 537 [3d Dept., Dec. 2, 1999]; Matter of Patterson v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 611; [3d Dept., Nov. 4, 1999]), particularly since he admitted that some of the stamps in question belonged to him.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.