MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of assault on an inmate and violent conduct. Upon petitioner's administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed. Petitioner subsequently commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and we confirm.
We reject petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report is defective because it fails to state the specific role that petitioner played in the assault (see, 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [c]). The misbehavior report states that petitioner, acting in concert with others, cut another inmate in the face with a razor-type weapon. Thus, the report contained the required specificity (see,Matter of Vogelsang v. Coombe, 105 A.D.2d 913, 914, aff'd on mem below 66 N.Y.2d 835).
Contrary to petitioner's contention, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony from the correction officer who authored it, together with the testimony from the confidential informant stating that petitioner did inflict serious injury upon another inmate, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Cobb v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 747, 706 N.Y.S.2d 199; Matter of Santos v. Goord, 255 A.D.2d 949).
Moreover, nothing in the record supports petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer presiding at this proceeding was biased or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Bernier v. Goord, 269 A.D.2d 640, 704 N.Y.S.2d 169). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.