Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of THOMAS VOGELSANG, Appellant, v. PHILIP COOMBE, JR., as Superintendent of Eastern New York Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court ( 105 A.D.2d 913). (See also, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130.) We add only that (1) appellant cannot complain that he was denied an employee assistant (see, 7 N.Y.CRR 251-4.1, 254.4), having himself waived that right, and (2) the proceeding was timely commenced and concluded, in light of the circumstances present and the authorization received during the hearing to interview necessary witnesses. The propriety of the Appellate Division's dismissal of certain charges is not before us.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur.

Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF VOGELSANG v. COOMBE
(Nov 14, 1985)