DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated September 9, 1999, which denied reargument, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated September 9, 1999, which denied the appellant's motion to vacate the order dated February 21, 1996, and to dismiss the complaint is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, the order dated February 21, 1996, is vacated, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against her, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.
The plaintiff failed to move for leave to enter judgment against the appellant within one year after she defaulted in answering the complaint. Accordingly, the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellant was deemed abandoned (see, CPLR 3215[c]; Nevling v. Chrysler Corp., 206 A.D.2d 221, 225). To avoid dismissal the plaintiff was required to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely seek leave to enter a default judgment, and demonstrate the merits of his cause of action (see, Akler v. Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 257 A.D.2d 640; Winfield v. Garenani, 246 A.D.2d 537; Eaves v. Ocana, 122 A.D.2d 18). Since the plaintiff failed to meet this burden, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellant's motion to vacate the order granting the plaintiff leave to enter judgment against her upon her default in answering, and dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against her pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) (see, Duperval v. Hoyle, ___ A.D.2d ___ [2d Dept., May 8, 2000]; Akler v. Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., supra; DiCarlo v. Bravo Tours, 129 A.D.2d 552).