AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GILDA AKLER et al., Respondents, v. BOOTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER et al., Defendants, and MAIN STREET OB/GYN ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Main Street Ob/Gyn Associates, P. C., and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The defendant Main Street Ob/Gyn Associates, P. C., moved to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to enter a judgment against it up on its default in answering or appearing within one year of the default pursuant to CPLR 3215. To avoid dismissal of a complaint under such circumstances a plaintiff "must offer a reasonable excuse for the delay and demonstrate the merits of the complaint" ( Richards v. Lewis, 243 A.D.2d 615, 616; see, First Nationwide Bank v. Pretel, 240 A.D.2d 629; Ingenito v. Grumman Corp., 192 A.D.2d 509). In opposition to the appellant's motion, the plaintiffs failed to submit any evidence demonstrating the merits of their action ( see, Mosberg v. Elahi, 80 N.Y.2d 941; cf., Hoffman v. Salitan, 203 A.D.2d 91, 92).

Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AKLER v. BOOTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
(Jan 25, 1999)