DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that reversible error took place when the prosecutor repeatedly asked him during cross-examination why he did not ask his co-arrestees at either the arrest scene, the precinct station house, or the arraignment to exonerate him, and that such error was compounded when the prosecutor referred to the defendant's pretrial silence during summation. Counsel for the defense raised a general objection to the prosecutor's questions on this subject on one occasion, and objections on different grounds on other occasions. These objections are not sufficient to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, People v. West, 212 A.D.2d 651; People v. Blacks, 221 A.D.2d 351; see generally, People v. Qualls, 55 N.Y.2d 733; People v. Odiot, 242 A.D.2d 308). Further, the defendant's claim regarding the prosecutor's summation remarks is similarly unpreserved (see, People v. Gonzalez, 202 A.D.2d 606).
In any event, any error on the part of the prosecutor was rendered harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Basora, 75 N.Y.2d 992; People v. Covington, 161 A.D.2d 784).