AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

U.S. DENTAL, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HART ARMONK ASSOCIATES, LLC, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants' motion to vacate an order granting the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their default in appearing or answering. The defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see, Bravo v. New York City Hous. Auth., 253 A.D.2d 510; Swedish v. Bourie, 233 A.D.2d 495; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. DENTAL v. HART ARMONK ASSOCIATES
(Nov 6, 2000)