AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

MATTER OF HAROLD MAYERI, APPELLANT, v. ISRAELLA MAYERI, RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Family Court Act § 439(e) provides that an aggrieved party may submit to a Family Court Judge specific written objections to the final order of the Hearing Examiner within 35 days after the mailing of the order to such party. Since the father did not timely submit written objections to the Hearing Examiner`s final order of support, the Family Court properly refused to consider the objections on this ground.

Moreover, the Family Court also properly refused to consider the father's objections on the ground that he failed to file proof of service of a copy of the objections on the mother (see, Matter of Rinaldi v. Rinaldi, 239 A.D.2d 506; Matter of Fokine v. Prisciantelli, 208 A.D.2d 534).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MAYERI v. MAYERI
(Jan 11, 2001)