Ordered that the order dated October 29, 1991, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court properly dismissed the appellant's written objections to the order of support because the appellant failed to file proof of service upon the opposing party with the court at the time of filing the objections (see, Family Ct Act § 439 [e]). Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.