AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF WESLEY DOBSON, respondent, v. KIM MARSHALL, appellant.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court considered the totality of the circumstances in determining that the best interests of the parties' child would be served by transferring custody to the father (see, Matter of Maurasse v. Price, 277 A.D.2d 240; Matter of Castellano v. England, 275 A.D.2d 412). The Family Court's determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record, and it will not be disturbed on appeal (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v. W. Stephen S., 64 N.Y.2d 946; Matter of Ebert v. Ebert, 38 N.Y.2d 700; Matter of McCoy v. McCoy, 277 A.D.2d 384; Lynch v. Acey, A.D.2d [2d Dept., Mar. 12, 2001]).

ALTMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SMITH and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DOBSON v. MARSHALL
(Jul 16, 2001)