AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS CASTELLANO, APPELLANT, v. KATHLEEN ENGLAND, RESPONDENT.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The findings of the Family Court, after a hearing, have a sound and substantial basis in the record and should be accorded great deference on appeal (see, Matter of Ebert v. Ebert, 38 N.Y.2d 700, 703; Alanna M. v. Duncan M., 204 A.D.2d 409). It is clear that the Family Court considered the totality of the circumstances in determining that the best interests of the parties' child would be served by awarding custody to the mother (see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167). Contrary to the father's contention, the recommendation of forensic experts that he be awarded custody is not determinative, but is only one factor for the court to consider (see, Matter of Prete v. Prete, 193 A.D.2d 804, 805). Accordingly, the determination of the Family Court should not be disturbed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CASTELLANO v. ENGLAND
(Aug 21, 2000)