ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs of disbursements.
It was proper for the Family Court to rely upon the determination of the Hearing Examiner in finding the father to be in willful violation of an order of support (see, Dariff v. Moskowitz, 252 A.D.2d 584; Faulkner v. Faulkner, 250 A.D.2d 767; Stone v. Stone, 236 A.D.2d 615; Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 232 A.D.2d 572). Accordingly, there is no merit to the father's contention that the Family Court erred in refusing to hold another hearing on the issue of his ability to pay.
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.
KRAUSMAN, J.P., FLORIO, FEUERSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.