AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of MARY FAULKNER, Respondent, v. JAMES FAULKNER, Appellant.

Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The proof before the Hearing Examiner of the appellant's failure to pay court-ordered child support constituted prima facie evidence of a willful violation of the support order ( see, Family Ct Act § 454[a]); The burden then shifted to the appellant to offer competent, credible evidence of his inability to comply with the order ( see, Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d 63, 69-70; Family Ct Act § 455). The appellant, however, did not sustain his burden to rebut the prima facie evidence of willfulness by showing sufficient proof of his inability to pay ( see, Family Ct Act § 454[a]; see, e.g., Matter of Bickwid v. Deutsch, 229 A.D.2d 533; see also, Matter of Powers v. Powers, supra, at 69).

Miller, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF FAULKNER v. FAULKNER
(May 18, 1998)