AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. FRANK COLLINS, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's Batson challenge (see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79) was properly denied since he failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. To establish a prima facie case, a defendant must demonstrate that members of a cognizable racial group have been excluded, and that there are facts and other relevant circumstances supporting an inference of impermissible discrimination (see, People v. Childress, 81 N.Y.2d 263, 266). The defendant failed to satisfy the second element. His assertion that the prosecutor struck a disproportionate number of black venirepersons was insufficient to establish a pattern of purposeful exclusion sufficient to raise an inference of discrimination (see, People v. Childress, supra, at 267; People v. White, 282 A.D.2d 628; People v. Redish, 262 A.D.2d 664; People v. Morla, 245 A.D.2d 468).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, O'BRIEN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLLINS
(Jan 22, 2002)