AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CONCETTA PICCIRILLO, ET AL., respondents, v. NACHUM Y. GREENSPAN, appellant.

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the application is granted, and the complaint is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

In opposition to the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a default judgment, the defendant made an application to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) because the plaintiffs failed to take proceedings for the entry of a judgment within one year after the default. To avoid such a dismissal, a plaintiff must offer a reasonable excuse for the delay and demonstrate the merits of the complaint (see, CPLR 3215 [c]; Akler v. Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 257 A.D.2d 640; Winfield v. Garenani, 246 A.D.2d 537; Richards v. Lewis, 243 A.D.2d 615). Here, the plaintiffs failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their delay (see, Rafiq v. Weston, 171 A.D.2d 783; Monzon v. Sony Motor, 115 A.D.2d 714), or demonstrate a meritorious action. Thus, the complaint should have been dismissed.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PICCIRILLO v. GREENSPAN
(Feb 19, 2002)