AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. LUIS FERNANDEZ, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination of whether to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, CPL 220.60; People v. Marzocco, 278 A.D.2d 515; People v. Ochoa, 179 A.D.2d 689). The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea, since his unsubstantiated claims of innocence and coercion were refuted by his statements during the plea allocution (see, People v. Badger, 288 A.D.2d 485 [2d Dept., Nov. 26, 2001]; People v. Marzocco, supra; People v. DeLeon, 254 A.D.2d 430; People v. Rosa, 239 A.D.2d 364; People v. Lisbon, 187 A.D.2d 457).

The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit (see, People v. Marzocco, supra; People v. DeLeon, supra).

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FERNANDEZ
(Feb 14, 2002)