AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. NEVILLE RANGOLAN, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination of whether to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court (see CPL 220.60; People v. Marzocco, 278 A.D.2d 515; People v. DeLeon, 254 A.D.2d 430, 431). In this case, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea, without a hearing, since his unsubstantiated claims of coercion and dissatisfaction with his attorney's representation were refuted by his statements during the plea allocution (see People v. Fernandez, 291 A.D.2d 456; People v. DeLeon, supra).

PRUDENTI, P.J., O'BRIEN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RANGOLAN
(Jun 18, 2002)