AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF CAROL MOST, ET AL., appellants, v. SAM D. WALKER, respondent-respondent, et al., respondent.

ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form in a cover sheet to a designating petition. Here, the cover sheet as it related to Sam D. Walker substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law and the regulations of the New York State Board of Elections (see Election Law § 6-134; 9 NYCRR 6215.6[a]; see also Matter of Ardesia v. Seidel, 242 A.D.2d 343; Matter of Fromson v. Lefever, 112 A.D.2d 1064, 1065, affd sub nom Matter of Barrett v. Scaringe, 65 N.Y.2d 946; Matter of Quintyne v. Canary, 104 A.D.2d 473, 474).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, O'BRIEN, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF CAROL MOST v. WALKER
(Aug 22, 2002)