Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of H. RICHARD BARRETT, Appellant, v. GEORGE P. SCARINGE et al., Constituting the Albany County Board of Elections, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of FERNANDO FERRER et al., Appellants,

MEMORANDUM.

The orders of the Appellate Divisions should be affirmed, without costs.

The common issue presented by these four appeals is whether the designating petition of a candidate, seeking party nomination for public office, should be invalidated on the ground that the petition cover sheet slightly understated the total number of signatures actually contained in the petition. This court, under circumstances closely analogous to those herein presented, has held an understatement of signatures to have constituted an inconsequential error which did not warrant invalidation of the designating petition. ( Matter of Jonas v Black, 63 N.Y.2d 685, affg 104 A.D.2d 466.) Accordingly, the petitions herein at issue satisfy the requirements of Election Law § 6-134 (2). ( See, Matter of Garrett v Alter, 65 N.Y.2d 529.)

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur.

In each case: Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BARRETT v. SCARINGE
(Aug 28, 1985)