MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized possession of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the detailed misbehavior report, the positive urinalysis test results and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who conducted the testing (see Matter of Bonaparte v. Goord, 289 A.D.2d 913). A typographical error on the misbehavior report showing an incorrect date and time for the collection of petitioner's urine sample was sufficiently explained by the reporting officer in his hearing testimony (see Matter of Rowe v. Goord, 257 A.D.2d 935; see also Matter of Taylor v. Taylor, 290 A.D.2d 778). The record establishes that the testing was conducted in reasonable compliance with all of the relevant regulatory procedures. Hence, the determination will not be disturbed (see Matter of Laraby v. Goord, 244 A.D.2d 690, 691; Matter of Benton v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 763). The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.