Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine sample tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. The misbehavior report, the positive results of two EMIT urinalysis tests and the testimony of the correction officer who conducted the tests provide substantial evidence to support the finding of guilt ( see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135, 143; Matter of Samuels v. Goord, 242 A.D.2d 841). Contrary to petitioner's claim, the record establishes that a proper foundation was laid for the introduction of the urinalysis test results ( see, 7 NYCRR 1020.5 [a] [1]) and that the correction officer reasonably complied with the regulatory procedures for conducting the tests ( see, Matter of Frazier v Coombe, 224 A.D.2d 794, 795). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.