Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The presence of a weapon was strongly suggested by a large bulge in defendant's waistband area, coupled with the fact that defendant was walking with his hand in his waistband over the bulge (see People v. Arps, 293 A.D.2d 260, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 648). Contrary to defendant's argument, the officer's testimony clearly established that the bulge was in defendant's waistband. When defendant, who reasonably appeared to have recognized the police despite their unmarked vehicle and civilian attire (see People v. Randolph, 278 A.D.2d 52, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 762), suddenly fled, keeping his hand in its suspicious position as the police merely got out of their car, pursuit was justified, and the recovery of the cocaine defendant abandoned in flight was not the product of any unlawful police activity.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.