Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Defendant's suspicious acts of nervously stopping and turning around to look at the slowly passing vehicle four to six times warranted the inference that defendant recognized the unmarked car as a police vehicle, and supplied an objective credible reason for the police to approach defendant and request information (see, People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 220), resulting in their observation of what appeared to be a gun in defendant's waistband.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.