DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was to quash the subpoena served upon the nonparty Gregg M. Sidoti is granted.
The plaintiff served a subpoena on the defendant's former attorney, the nonparty Gregg M. Sidoti, seeking, inter alia, information and documents concerning two of Sidoti's former clients, Inter Metal Fabricators, Inc., and Amboy Steel, Inc. Insofar as the subpoena sought the production of "any and all documents information [sic]" it was improper since it did not specify the documents sought with "reasonable particularity" (CPLR 3120[b]; see Matter of Ehmer, 272 A.D.2d 540; Finn v. Town of Southampton, 266 A.D.2d 429; Myrie v. Shelley, 237 A.D.2d 337; Fascaldi v. Fascaldi, 209 A.D.2d 578). Moreover, to the extent that the information sought by the plaintiff from Sidoti was not protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege ( see CPLR 4503[a]; Priest v. Hennessy, 51 N.Y.2d 62; Matter of Ehmer, supra; Miranda v. Miranda, 184 A.D.2d 286), the plaintiff failed to establish that the information was otherwise unobtainable ( see Golden Mark Maintenance v. Alarcon, 265 A.D.2d 377; Matter of Validation Review Assocs., 237 A.D.2d 614). Accordingly, that branch of the defendant's motion which was to quash the plaintiff's subpoena served upon Sidoti should have been granted.
SANTUCCI, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.