AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JOSEPH FINN, et al., plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, et al., defendants. (Action No. 1) JOSEPH E. McVEIGH, respondent, et al., plaintiff,

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the motion of Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation (hereinafter MBCC), a defendant in Action No. 2, which was to compel Joseph E. McVeigh, a plaintiff in Action No. 2, to provide authorizations for his complete academic, employment, and medical records. The notice to produce of MBCC was overbroad and failed to specify the documents sought with "reasonable particularity" (CPLR 3120[a][2]; Harrison v. Bayley Seton Hosp., Inc., 247 A.D.2d 513; Blum, Inc. v. Allied Hardware, 237 A.D.2d 492; Fascaldi v. Fascaldi, 209 A.D.2d 578, 579; American Reliance Ins. Co. v. National Gen. Ins. Co., 174 A.D.2d 591).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FINN v. TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON
(Nov 30, 1999)