AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CURTIS HAGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the mandatory surcharge to $150 and the crime victim assistance fee to $5 and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: As the People concede, it was a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Federal Constitution (US Const, art I, § 10 [1]) for Supreme Court to order defendant to pay a mandatory surcharge in the amount of $200 and a crime victim assistance fee of $10, ostensibly pursuant to an amendment to Penal Law § 60.35 (1)(a). Although defendant's criminal conduct occurred on April 6, 2000, after the date that the amendment stated that it was to be effective (April 1, 2000), the amendment was not signed into law until May 15, 2000. Thus, the amendment is inapplicable to defendant's conviction ( see Donnino, Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 60.35, 2004 Pocket Part, at 126; see also People v. Goldwire, 301 A.D.2d 677, 678). We therefore modify the judgment by reducing the mandatory surcharge to $150 and the crime victim assistance fee to $5 ( see People v. Fabela, 240 A.D.2d 677, 678, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 939; People v. McIntosh, 163 A.D.2d 810; People v. Bethea, 133 A.D.2d 836, 837, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 929).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HAGER
(Mar 19, 2004)