AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PHILIP E. MARQUIS, ET AL., appellants, v. MORTON M. EISENSTEIN, ET AL., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to summary judgment on the issue of liability ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851; Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Questions of fact exist as to whether the plaintiff pedestrian was negligent in crossing the roadway in a place other than an intersection or a crosswalk, and whether the defendant driver failed to exercise due care to avoid the accident ( see Schager v. Lino Bordi, Inc., 2 A.D.3d 828; Dragunova v. Dondero, 305 A.D.2d 449, 450; Garner v. Fox, 265 A.D.2d 525, 526).

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARQUIS v. EISENSTEIN
(Mar 29, 2004)