DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the plea was not knowingly and intelligently made because the Supreme Court failed to advise him of the statutorily mandated period of post-release supervision ( see generally People v. Melio, 304 A.D.2d 247) is unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant never sought to withdraw his plea at the time of sentencing on this basis, nor did he move to vacate the judgment of conviction on this basis ( see People v. Folks, 306 A.D.2d 355; People v. Torres, 305 A.D.2d 701; People v. Cruz, 305 A.D.2d 424).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.