DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court erred in failing to advise him that he would be subject to an automatic and statutorily-mandated three-year period of post-release supervision following the completion of his determinate sentence. However, this contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Wilson, 296 A.D.2d 430, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 540), as is his contention that his factual allocution was insufficient (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. Konstantinides, 295 A.D.2d 537, 538). The defendant's remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination.
ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.