DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
By knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waiving her right to appeal, the defendant waived review of her present contention that the County Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying her youthful offender status ( see People v. Muhammad, 3 A.D.3d 585; People v. Hubbard, 288 A.D.2d 490).
The defendant's contention that her plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made because she was not informed that she would be subject to a mandatory period of post-release supervision is unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant did not move to withdraw her plea of guilty on this ground or vacate the judgment of conviction in the County Court ( see People v. Concepcion, 2 A.D.3d 873; People v. Chapman, 2 A.D.3d 647, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 596; People v. Mapp, 308 A.D.2d 462, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 575) and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
KRAUSMAN, J.P., LUCIANO, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.