AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ANTOINE HUBBARD, appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

By knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waiving his right to appeal, the defendant waived review of his present contention that the County Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying him youthful offender status (see, People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733; People v. Brown, 265 A.D.2d 486; People v. Williams, 204 A.D.2d 371). Additionally, the defendant's claim is unpreserved for appellate review because he never sought to withdraw his plea on that ground (see, People v. Brown, supra; People v. Marcia, 258 A.D.2d 534). In any event, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the application (see, People v. Marcia, supra).

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FRIEDMANN, FEUERSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HUBBARD
(Nov 26, 2001)