DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated May 20, 2002, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order is not appealable as of right ( see Family Ct Act § 365.1; Matter of Edwin L., 88 N.Y.2d 593, 600-601; Matter of Jeffrey M., 62 A.D.2d 858, 860), and we decline to grant leave to appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency ( see Matter of David H., 69 N.Y.2d 792, 793), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the Family Court's finding that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree ( cf. People v. Cintron, 95 N.Y.2d 329, 332; People v. Zorcik, 67 N.Y.2d 670, 671).
The appellant's contention that the Family Court should have drawn an adverse inference with respect to certain witnesses who did not testify at the fact-finding hearing is unpreserved for appellate review ( cf. CPL 470.05; People v. Russell, 209 A.D.2d 650, 651), and in any event, is without merit ( cf. People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 427).
The appellant's remaining contentions either are waived ( see Family Ct Act § 330.2; Matter of Leslie S., 172 A.D.2d 754), or without merit.
ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.